|
The Washington Franklin
Series,
or
the "Series of 1908" as it is known by the USPS, came on the heels of the 1902
Series of regular issues which in turn had received its fair share of criticism for "overly ornate" designs. One of the great ironies of this series is that the
Post Office was actually trying to simplify
the designs of the regularly issued stamps to cut down on
production costs. Emulating the European use of
a single design of an existing monarch's head on many denominations,
but having no monarch to call our own, the U.S.
Post Office opted for two vignette designs, a Washington "head" and a Franklin "head".
From these two simple yet elegant designs one will find 220
major and 99 minor stamp varieties as listed in the Scott
2000 Specialized Catalogue of U.S. Stamps and Covers. The
use of five
design variations, two paper types, two types of watermarked
paper as well as unwatermarked paper, three printing
methods,
a minimum of fourteen distinct perforations or combinations
thereof, two
overprints, a full spectrum of colors and twenty
denominations makes it easy to see how complex this
"simplification" turned out to be for the
philatelist.
The study of the Washington Franklin stamps has traditionally
been an area of some difficulty for many collectors of U.S.
stamps. On the other hand collecting
the Washington Franklin Heads can be one of the more fascinating
areas in all of philately, presenting a wonderful microcosm of
the evolution of stamp production in the United States as well
as the entire world.
To provide an aide in the study of the Washington Franklin stamps, we have taken
the liberty of breaking the series into thirteen sets, each highlighting
an important change in the way U.S. stamps were made over the
fourteen year period from 1908 to
1922. Please click on the
appropriate link at the right to learn more about each
important change.
|
|
. |
|
The
Evolution of the
Washington-Franklin Series
1908-1922
|
|
| Year: |
Change:
|
Reason
for Change: |
| 1908: |
--------- |
no change: Perf 12, Double-line Watermark, First
Design, Flat Plate |
| 1909: |
Blue
Papers |
to strengthen the paper ( higher rag content) and to reduce
shrinkage |
| 1910: |
Single-line
Watermark |
to strengthen the paper (less paper
removed in the watermarking process) |
| 1910: |
Perf
8.5 |
to lessen the separation of stamps
in vending machines (a lesser number of holes per
inch) |
| 1912: |
New
Designs |
to comply with International Postal
Union guidelines and to make differentiate denominations
easier |
| 1914: |
Perf
10 |
to lessen separation of the stamps
in the sheets themselves and to make it easier to
separate the coil stamps (the 8.5 gauge proved
difficult) |
| 1915: |
Rotary
Press
with watermark |
faster and more efficient printing
technique than the flat plate printing method, quality
nearly as good. Enabled the production of much longer
sheets, a must for coil roll production |
| 1916: |
No
Watermark |
cheaper than watermarked paper;
also, watermarks difficult to detect and therefore not
an effective deterrent to counterfeiters |
| 1916
Coils: |
Rotary
Press
no watermark |
see the previous two reasons; this is
actually not a change per se |
|
1917: |
Perf
11 |
to ease the separation of stamps,
the perf 10 stamps sometimes tore when separating the
sheet stamps |
| 1919: |
Offset |
to eliminate the abrasive effects
of the inferior inks available during the World War I
era, by not using engraved plates wear was minimized
and the plates lasted longer |
|
1919-1923: In addition, although not a change per se,
several important Washington Franklin stamps
were issued from coil sheet waste and
as experimental
rotary press printings - more
...
|
|
Also in 1919,
the U.S. Post Office delivered to
Shanghai, China the then current
Washington Franklins, perforated 11 stamps on
unwatermarked paper stock. These stamps were
subsequently overprinted "Shanghai
China" and surcharged at double the original
denomination on all values (the 1c through
$1), creating a new set of stamps (the 2c through
$2) with the "Shanghai"
overprint. |
|
|